The Crystal Hall
Forum Search:
Return to the Stories


Home » The Crystal Hall » Character Discussions » Chou Lee
Re: Chou Lee [message #37977 is a reply to message #399 ] Thu, 30 April 2009 09:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
MitchellTF  is currently offline MitchellTF
Messages: 488
Registered: January 2009
Violet, the problem with the way that you argue is that you're discounting, not considering, other people's points. I gave the examples in an attempt to show that my basic premise was not something that could simply be rejected. You seem not to consider the other person's argument as something that COULD be valid.


http://www.msfhigh.com
Re: Chou Lee [message #37978 is a reply to message #399 ] Thu, 30 April 2009 09:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Gabe  is currently offline Gabe
Messages: 100
Registered: April 2008
Location: <.< ... >.> ....
On another note, I was just wondering, which dialect of chinese does Chou speak in? I'm thinkin' Mandarin...


The love child of Eris and Loki...my pet is Coyote...yes folks, be afraid, be very afraid...
Re: Chou Lee [message #37980 is a reply to message #37976 ] Thu, 30 April 2009 10:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Faraway  is currently offline Faraway
Messages: 1105
Registered: January 2009
Location: Russia
About black-and-white POV - on Girl Genius site there is a side story about Heterodyne Boys winding up in another dimension. The Lord Protector of that place rapidly returned them back, and noted that they see world as BW, and will not tolerate B, while his own world is constituted of countless shades of gray without bure BW. Thus, had they stayed, in their quest to be W they would have utterly wrecked hte place, because no pure W was present.


Never mind, I'm just a guy.

Eldritch: “Details, details, no pokey the cranky bitch.”
Bladedancer: “But Hekate’s not here!”
Re: Chou Lee [message #37981 is a reply to message #399 ] Thu, 30 April 2009 10:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
MitchellTF  is currently offline MitchellTF
Messages: 488
Registered: January 2009
Link please?

(Interestingly enough, I have a rather, if not 'black and white', at the least DEFINED way of seeing 'good and evil'. The guiding principle behind 'good' is complete selflessness, sacrificing yourself for the benefits of others. The guiding principle behind 'evil' is complete selfishness, sacrificing of others to benefit yourself. It's not perfect, but it solves a good few problems.)


http://www.msfhigh.com
Re: Chou Lee [message #37984 is a reply to message #399 ] Thu, 30 April 2009 10:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
vshnth  is currently offline vshnth
Messages: 96
Registered: March 2009
Location: Canada - specifically, To...
The original Heterodyne Boys, not Agatha's family:

http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/stories/HBstory/HBstory.php

[Updated on: Thu, 30 April 2009 11:00]


Leave it to me to live in a defective fictional universe.
Re: Chou Lee [message #38012 is a reply to message #37978 ] Thu, 30 April 2009 15:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Valar_Morghulis  is currently offline Valar_Morghulis
Messages: 36
Registered: April 2009
Location: Northern VA

Gabe wrote on Thu, 30 April 2009 09:23

On another note, I was just wondering, which dialect of chinese does Chou speak in? I'm thinkin' Mandarin...


All the actual Chinese written so far has been Mandarin, so yes, you would be correct.


"The truth is always greater than the words we use to describe it" - Matthew Stover, Traitor
Re: Chou Lee [message #38032 is a reply to message #38012 ] Thu, 30 April 2009 17:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bladedancer  is currently offline Bladedancer
Messages: 1164
Registered: January 2005
Location: Tennessee

Valar_Morghulis wrote on Thu, 30 April 2009 15:45

Gabe wrote on Thu, 30 April 2009 09:23

On another note, I was just wondering, which dialect of chinese does Chou speak in? I'm thinkin' Mandarin...


All the actual Chinese written so far has been Mandarin, so yes, you would be correct.

Mandarin is all I know. While I know it is not historically accurate to have Chou and Destiny's Wave speaking Mandarin, it is what I can do.If I tried any other dialect then I would be using translators and not any personal knowledge of the language.


"...or I swear by my pretty floral bonnet that I will end you." Captain Malcolm Reynolds, Firefly.

My LJ name is poetheather. Come, read, enjoy?
Re: Chou Lee [message #38038 is a reply to message #399 ] Thu, 30 April 2009 17:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Valar_Morghulis  is currently offline Valar_Morghulis
Messages: 36
Registered: April 2009
Location: Northern VA

Presumably Destiny's Wave has been kicking around China recently enough to know something that is linguistically close enough to modern Mandarin for it to work. Chou likely sounds oddly formal, stiff, and old-fashioned to a modern Mandarin speaker.

Much like her English is slightly formal compared to the average 14 year old. She has these wierd verbal characteristics, like the virutal absence of contractions. Then again, most of Team Kimba has odd verbal ticks every so often.

[Updated on: Thu, 30 April 2009 17:56]


"The truth is always greater than the words we use to describe it" - Matthew Stover, Traitor
Re: Chou Lee [message #38039 is a reply to message #37981 ] Thu, 30 April 2009 18:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Belgarion213  is currently offline Belgarion213
Messages: 353
Registered: March 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
MitchellTF wrote on Thu, 30 April 2009 10:18

Link please?

(Interestingly enough, I have a rather, if not 'black and white', at the least DEFINED way of seeing 'good and evil'. The guiding principle behind 'good' is complete selflessness, sacrificing yourself for the benefits of others. The guiding principle behind 'evil' is complete selfishness, sacrificing of others to benefit yourself. It's not perfect, but it solves a good few problems.)


No human by that definition would ever be able to be classified as 'good'. All selflessness is by definition a form of selfishneess. 'Ill help you feed your starving famiiy and I will feel good about myself'. You would need to find an utterly RARE person to come close to 'good'. We are talking true saints etc.
Re: Chou Lee [message #38045 is a reply to message #38039 ] Thu, 30 April 2009 19:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
MitchellTF  is currently offline MitchellTF
Messages: 488
Registered: January 2009
Belgarion213 wrote on Thu, 30 April 2009 18:24

MitchellTF wrote on Thu, 30 April 2009 10:18

Link please?

(Interestingly enough, I have a rather, if not 'black and white', at the least DEFINED way of seeing 'good and evil'. The guiding principle behind 'good' is complete selflessness, sacrificing yourself for the benefits of others. The guiding principle behind 'evil' is complete selfishness, sacrificing of others to benefit yourself. It's not perfect, but it solves a good few problems.)


No human by that definition would ever be able to be classified as 'good'. All selflessness is by definition a form of selfishneess. 'Ill help you feed your starving famiiy and I will feel good about myself'. You would need to find an utterly RARE person to come close to 'good'. We are talking true saints etc.


I would disagree with defining 'doing good deeds because it makes you happy' as selfish.


http://www.msfhigh.com
Re: Chou Lee [message #38092 is a reply to message #38045 ] Fri, 01 May 2009 00:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James K  is currently offline James K
Messages: 529
Registered: January 2009
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
MitchellTF: That's an interesting ethical perspective, but not one I ascribe to. It may be my economics training, but I simply can't see selfishness as a vice, nor selflessness as especially virtuous. The massive gains in standard of living int he past few centuries are all the product of selfish behaviour, and I'm firmly of the opinion that miguided good intentions have done more damage to humanity than deliberate evil.

For me its all about the outcomes of an action (or the reasonably forseable outcomes if we're assigning moral merti to the actor) that determines good, though I realise this is one perspective among many.


First Lesson: Every princess needs a battleaxe
Re: Chou Lee [message #38101 is a reply to message #38092 ] Fri, 01 May 2009 01:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
MitchellTF  is currently offline MitchellTF
Messages: 488
Registered: January 2009
James K wrote on Fri, 01 May 2009 00:39

MitchellTF: That's an interesting ethical perspective, but not one I ascribe to. It may be my economics training, but I simply can't see selfishness as a vice, nor selflessness as especially virtuous. The massive gains in standard of living int he past few centuries are all the product of selfish behaviour, and I'm firmly of the opinion that miguided good intentions have done more damage to humanity than deliberate evil.

For me its all about the outcomes of an action (or the reasonably forseable outcomes if we're assigning moral merti to the actor) that determines good, though I realise this is one perspective among many.


I do not define 'enlightened self-interest' as evil, however. And, what do you mean by misguided good intentions?


http://www.msfhigh.com
Re: Chou Lee [message #38102 is a reply to message #38092 ] Fri, 01 May 2009 01:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Starbuck  is currently offline Starbuck
Messages: 158
Registered: February 2009
James K wrote on Fri, 01 May 2009 00:39

MitchellTF: That's an interesting ethical perspective, but not one I ascribe to. It may be my economics training, but I simply can't see selfishness as a vice, nor selflessness as especially virtuous. The massive gains in standard of living int he past few centuries are all the product of selfish behaviour, and I'm firmly of the opinion that miguided good intentions have done more damage to humanity than deliberate evil.

For me its all about the outcomes of an action (or the reasonably forseable outcomes if we're assigning moral merti to the actor) that determines good, though I realise this is one perspective among many.


Ah, the ends justify the means.

Kill one man and you're a murderer. Kill 1000 and your country gives you a medal.

Personally I believe that both good and evil are subjective. Each is predicated on the existence AND recognition of the other. Each is determined on an individual basis by every single person. Evil men do not view themselves as such. Winners write history according to their own definitions.

Some actions are viewed by the vast majority of people as evil... some are viewed by similar margins as good. However, there will be some who view each situation as the opposite.

[Updated on: Fri, 01 May 2009 01:14]


"Power? Responsibility??? BAH!!!"
*BOOM*
"EEP!!!"

`_____
|_____\___
]_|=|_[|G_\__________
]__|=|_[-___________/
|______/Starbuck1979
Re: Chou Lee [message #38108 is a reply to message #38092 ] Fri, 01 May 2009 03:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Violet  is currently offline Violet
Messages: 368
Registered: July 2008
James K wrote on Fri, 01 May 2009 00:39

MitchellTF: That's an interesting ethical perspective, but not one I ascribe to. It may be my economics training,
Oh snap Smile

James K wrote on Fri, 01 May 2009 00:39

but I simply can't see selfishness as a vice, nor selflessness as especially virtuous. The massive gains in standard of living int he past few centuries are all the product of selfish behaviour,
Just remember not to take selfishness too far Wink abuse of monopoly power being the classic example.

James K wrote on Fri, 01 May 2009 00:39

and I'm firmly of the opinion that miguided good intentions have done more damage to humanity than deliberate evil.
Clarify please: Nearly every frothing dictator believes they're doing good. Do you use the person's own beliefs or a "common sense" test?

James K wrote on Fri, 01 May 2009 00:39

For me its all about the outcomes of an action (or the reasonably forseable outcomes if we're assigning moral merti to the actor) that determines good,

I don't know, that for example really contradicts the principle of Autonomy in Medical Ethics. When curing someone who dosn't want to be cured the reasonably foreseeable outcome is that they'll live a long and healthy life after the operation. Dose that give the doctor the right to ignore his patients wishes.

To me, I've sort of given up on finding a working definition and sort of do it by feel on a case by case basis.


Dilbert: You were always a great hero of mine
Leonardo da Vinci: Is that so?
Dilbert: Yes I tried to model my carea after yours: Engineer, inventor, artist
Leonardo da Vinci: No no no, those were all sidelines, I am at heart a businessman
Re: Chou Lee [message #38116 is a reply to message #38108 ] Fri, 01 May 2009 08:12 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Sir Lee  is currently offline Sir Lee
Messages: 3108
Registered: May 2005
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
James K has a point. Just about ANY technical progress you can name came about from one single, selfish source:
Lazyness.
Lazyness is the mother of invention.
People figure out better ways to do stuff not because they wish to better the lives of their fellow men, but because they don't want to do it the hard way anymore.

So, we go back to the "virtue in moderation" again. SOME selfishness is good, TOO MUCH of it is bad...


Don't call me Shirley. You will surely make me surly.
--
Sent from my Bugs Industries® bPhone™
Previous Topic:David Goodkind
Next Topic:Belphoebe
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Jun 18 03:32:39 EDT 2013

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02980 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 2.8.0.
Copyright ©2001-2009 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software